Sunday, November 23, 2014

One of the Dumbest Arguments I Have Ever Seen

The term "Neoliberalism " has come up a couple times in this blog. I am sure it will come up more.

I like to read texts written from opposing points of view, and have done so with Neoliberalism. One such book Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government  presented to me an argument I copy in its entirety below.  It is one of the most idiotic arguments I have ever seen. And I have taught for 20+years, so have seen some doozies in student paper. No student has ever gone this far or been this ridiculous

When Yaron [one of the authors] taught at a university, he gave his students an entire semester to name a recent movie in which the hero was a successful businessman. Few of them ever were able to, although a handful of such movies do exist. Nowadays , there’s Iron Man and we suppose The Aviator, if you don’t count the fact that Howard Hughes was crazy. But if you want a total nonchallenge , try to name a movie where the villain was a businessman— we’ll wager there’s at least one playing right now.

In 2006, the Business & Media Institute published a study in which it concluded that if you see a businessman on TV, he’s as likely to be killing as he is to be making a killing.

[B] usinessmen on TV committed more crimes than any other demographic. . . . According to primetime TV, you are 21 times more likely to be kidnapped or murdered at the hands of a businessman than the mob. Businessmen also committed crimes five times more often than terrorists and four times more often than gangs.

A different study by the Business & Media Institute found that by age eighteen, “the average TV viewer has seen businessmen attempt more than ten thousand murders and countless lesser offenses, all in the name of greed.” Asked about Hollywood’s obsession with bad guy businessmen , former chairman of NBC Grant Tinker said, “Businessmen deserve what they get. . . . Dammit, there is a lot of villainy in business.”

And it’s not just Hollywood that hates businessmen. “Few are the businessmen in literature and drama,” observes economist Diane Coyle, “and those there are tend to be, like Trollope’s Melmotte or Fitzgerald’s Gatsby, either flawed characters or outright villains.” These are just some of the symptoms of a widespread cultural phenomenon: Today, businessmen are probably the most vilified group in America. Don recalls watching the South Park movie some years ago in a crowded theater. When a cartoon Bill Gates was gratuitously murdered, the audience broke into applause. Although publicly wishing harm on a group of Americans is generally frowned upon, we make an exception for businessmen. Radio host Thom Hartmann, after reflecting on why there are so few people capable of running America’s most successful companies, concluded that only sociopaths are capable of being CEOs . National Public Radio’s Patt Morrison declared of the CEOs who presided over failed companies during the financial crisis (most of whom were not accused of committing any crime), “I want blood .” Columnist Maureen Dowd was a bit more circumspect, asking only for “shackles” and “show trials.”

Why have businessmen been so vilified ? It’s not for any particular evil, real or imagined. It’s not because some may have produced shoddy products or defrauded customers. (Political leaders have committed crimes, enslaved nations, even slaughtered millions, and we go on giving them more and more power.) It is, instead , because we view businessmen as in some sense corrupt by their very nature: Businessmen, we think, are greedy. They are driven by the selfish pursuit of profit— they have an insatiable desire for “more”— and we equate that with a willingness to lie, cheat, and steal . Businessmen, we conclude, are necessarily heartless, greedy bastards out for themselves , willing to sacrifice the welfare of employees , customers, friends, and orphans if it helps them make a buck.

Just think back to the classic film It’s a Wonderful Life. The hero is a businessman—an unsuccessful businessman, whose goodwill drives him into bankruptcy. Who is the successful businessman? It’s crotchety old Mr. Potter, the allegedly selfish banker who revels in destroying everyone around him, who profits ( somehow) by denying loans to the creditworthy little guy, and who doesn’t hesitate to steal from his competitors and send innocent men to prison. It’s a portrait that many Americans seem to find plausible.


Brook, Yaron; Watkins, Don (2012-09-18). Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government (Kindle Locations 705-710). Palgrave Macmillan. Kindle Edition.  

Yes. There you have it.  Since businessmen are  FICTIONALLY portrayed as criminals, they are being wronged. They are victims.

I wonder if these authors complain about the lack of critical thinking ability they see in their students or new employees. And if they do, I doubt they are aware of the irony here. 

I don't mind arguments I disagree with. I like to hear different points of view. Often these different views change my own perspectives. What I hate are DUMB arguments. Arguments that don't work but the speakers refuse to (or just can't) see. That bothers me because those people cannot be engaged in real debate. 






Saturday, November 22, 2014

One Day in the President's Office #4








Think I am making this up? Try http://www.forbes.com/pictures/gfhf45fim/texas-tech-university/ or http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/09/21/fashion/college-recreation-now-includes-pool-parties-and-river-rides.html?referrer=










Thursday, November 20, 2014

Freshchunking or How to Get Your Blog Blacklisted

I remembered something tonight that I had not thought about in a long time.  And because of it, I tumbled on to something I find very disturbing.

At Brandeis University, in the fall of 1987, two years after I had graduated, a group of students, protesting what they saw as forced political correctness put together a school-wide referendum that mandated the school officially relabel all "freshmen" as "freshchunks." It causes quite the stir on campus and even made it into the New York Times. Ironic statement or not, a lot of people were terrified it would pass and the school might be obligated to follow along.

For the record, it got voted down by more than 2-1. But I am not writing about the referendum itself. I am more intrigued/disturbed by the fact that when I went back to refresh my memory about the vote, I could find NOTHING online about it. Not even the New York Times article. I would assume Brandeis has cleaned all mention of the incident off the Internet.  (The fact that I could find so little even had me beginning to question whether it really happened. But finally I was able to scare up copies of  The Justice, on the Internet Archive. I then had to hand-page through a couple years of editions until I found confirmation.)

I find it outrageous that a school - a place of leaning -  would do something like this (although I am not surprised). This was a very silly episode, but it really has me wondering: how often do schools do this? Do they clean their web history all the time? Do various crimes and other negative items gets buried deep so prospective students might never know about them? We already know a lot of schools play fast and easy with crime reporting standards (even though they are mandated by the Fed).  How often do schools basically "censor" the Net?

For that matter, now that I have put the terms "freshchunk" and "Brandeis University" together on a single web page, does that mean my blog is going to be buried?

Tuesday, November 11, 2014

One Day in the President's Office #3

















One Day in the President's Office #2

Working on additional content. In the meantime, let's visit with our friends again...








Here's our budget my old friends. *
We have a shortfall once again
Enrollment numbers we do lack
Guess some instructors we will have to sack
We need to cover our own salaries
What must be, must be.
Alas for the sound of slicing.

* Sung to the song "The Sound of Silence" 
In restless dreams I sometimes see
Crying students begging me
'Neath the halo of a poor GPA
Screaming: "Please don't send me away!"
And then I get punched in the gut
By a looming salary cut
I do indeed hear the sound of slicing.

We give them opportunity
A chance to live the American Dream
They thank us by flunking out
In an endless academic rout
Then their federal aid comes to an end
Which to me does offend
Alas, for the sound of slicing


I just got back from a conference
Where I was met with deference
Now I hear that I might have to save
And my travel budget I must shave
THis is such indignity
How can it be.
We need to hear the sound of slicing.

Fools said I: "You do not know."
"That our salaries must grow."
We're running out of services to cut
And student supports that we can freely gut
Our salaries must be six figures
It's de rigeur
Here comes the sound of slicing.

Though the student will scream and cry
Claiming we have offered them a lie
For the record: we don't care
Higher ed is buyer beware
Corporate college is here to stay
It is the Neoliberal way
Let's get down to the sound of slicing! 




Saturday, November 1, 2014

One Day in the President's Office #1

I have been thinking about doing something like this for a while. Apologies for the quality. My first time drawing and I am still getting a hang of the software.









The school's Executive Committee in conference.
The College President is concerned. 


The Dean immediately considers all angles.
The Provost is flummoxed.

The Vice -resident of Something Important is just plain worried. 

****Ever since I was a young man
I've worked in Higher Ed
After twenty years of slaving
My soul is nearly dead.
But I have got a talent
At challenges I never pale
Give me an enrollment number
I will meet it without fail!

*** Sung to the tune "Pinball Wizard" (and with sincere apologies to The Who)
He's an Admission's wizard
There has to be a trick
An admissions Wizard
His goals are always met!
How do you think he does it?
I don't know!
What makes him so good?!

He stands before prospectives
Deftly selling our old school
Sometimes attracting scholars
But usually, those who drool
All are FAFSA eligible
Tuition check's in the mail
Give him an enrollment number
He'll meet it without fail!

He's an Admission's wizard
There has to be a trick
An admissions Wizard
His goals are always met!
How do you think he does it?
I don't know!
Maybe he has no soul!



We can't stop him now
We have six figure salaries to feed
I beg thee Oh Lord!
Let him his enrollment numbers meet!
I'm looking at my numbers
Your budget deficits
No one ever told me
Your school is such shit.
I ain't seen nothing like it
This time I must stand tall
If I don't meet my enrollment numbers
This school is going to fall!!!